The directive published by Corrective Services of Canada (CSC) banned smoking within cells and private family visiting facilities in federal prisons. Prisoners challenged the validity of the directive. The Court upheld the directive, reasoning that the commissioners of CSC have the authority to regulate and the directive is consistent with the Non-Smoking Health Act.
Tobacco companies or front groups may challenge any legislative or regulatory measure that affects their business interests. Unlike public interest litigation, these cases seek to weaken health measures. These cases frequently involve the industry proceeding against the government. For example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional.
The directive published by Corrective Services of Canada (CSC) banned smoking within cells and private family visiting facilities in federal prisons. Prisoners challenged the validity of the directive. The Court upheld the directive, reasoning that the commissioners of CSC have the authority to regulate and the directive is consistent with the Non-Smoking Health Act.