United States

The plaintiff, representing her deceased husband, a lifelong smoker, claimed that her husband had switched to smoking Carlton cigarettes in an attempt to reduce his risk of tobacco-related diseases based on advertisements of the cigarettes' manufacturer, American Tobacco (now Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.), that Carlton cigarettes contained the lowest amounts of tar and nicotine. Her husband nevertheless died of lung cancer two decades later. The plaintiff asserted nearly thirty claims, including negligent misrepresentation, negligence, and failure to warn, against all entities involved in the manufacture and sale of Carlton cigarettes during the period which her husband smoked that brand of cigarettes.  She also sought punitive damages for the various civil violations. The Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas dismissed the claims against the majority of the defendants, and a jury returned a verdict in favor of the remaining defendants. On appeal, the court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately present any issues for review because the number of claims she included in her appeal violated the purpose of judicial review. The court affirmed the original judgment accordingly.