A company manufactured toothpaste containing 4% tobacco, which is prohibited by the Indian Dugs and Cosmetics Act. Relying on information from various scientific organizations about the public health hazards of tobacco, the court affirmed an earlier decision prohibiting the use of any amount of tobacco in toothpaste or tooth-powders.
Tobacco companies or front groups may challenge any legislative or regulatory measure that affects their business interests. Unlike public interest litigation, these cases seek to weaken health measures. These cases frequently involve the industry proceeding against the government. For example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional.
Any violation of a law designed to ensure fair trade, competition, or the free flow of truthful information in the marketplace. For example, a government may require businesses to disclose detailed information about products—particularly in areas where safety or public health is an issue.
A company manufactured toothpaste containing 4% tobacco, which is prohibited by the Indian Dugs and Cosmetics Act. Relying on information from various scientific organizations about the public health hazards of tobacco, the court affirmed an earlier decision prohibiting the use of any amount of tobacco in toothpaste or tooth-powders.