TOBACCO CONTROL LAWS

State of Maharashtra v. Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan

The government appealed a Bombay High Court order that overturned police action prosecuting individuals for violations of the Maharashtra gutkha ban under the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court reversed the Bombay High Court's finding regarding Indian Penal Code (IPC) prosecution, noting that there is no prohibition on IPC prosecution merely because provisions in the Food Safety Standards Act prescribe penalties. The Supreme Court remanded consideration of specific IPC offenses against the individuals to the Bombay High Court.

DOWNLOAD DOCUMENT

State of Maharashtra v. Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan, Criminal Appeal No. 1195, Supreme Court of India (2018).

  • India
  • Sep 20, 2018
  • Supreme Court of India

Parties

Plaintiff State of Maharashtra

Defendant Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan

Legislation Cited

Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006

Indian Penal Code

Related Documents

None

Type of Litigation

Government Enforcement Action
Government, through its agencies and officials including prosecutors, may seek to enforce its health laws. For example, the government may revoke the license of a retailer that sells tobacco products to minors. These cases may also directly involve the tobacco industry, for example, a government might impound and destroy improperly labeled cigarette packs.

Tobacco Control Topics

None

Substantive Issues

Criminal Violation
A claim of an infringement of any criminal law.

Type of Tobacco Product

None

1400 I Street N.W.,
Suite 1200,
Washington, DC 20005
United States of America

Phone: (202) 296-5469

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids is a BBB-accredited charity and a
Guidestar Exchange Gold Participant.

© 2025 Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids | Trademarks | Copyright | Privacy

Site created and maintained by